Old Shatterhand napisał(a):hmmmm, no, I don't
Because I've learned, "What does it means ?".
So, why is it wrong, Can you tell me?
Because in Present Simple in third person singular we add "s" or "es" to a predicate (in this case: "mean") or an auxiliary verb ("do"). We don't add it to both. Do you understand now?
Old Shatterhand napisał(a):Ponownie napiszę to po Polsku (wybaczcie, że nadużywam tego języka w tym dziale). Czasu Present Continuous używamy gdy daną czynność wykonujemy dokładnie w tej samej chwili (tak wiem, że to wiecie), przykładowo, I'm writing - bo teraz piszę, ale w czasie pisania tego postu nie poprawiałem błędu, tak więc zwalnia to mnie od użycia tego czasu.
But you've fixed that mistake only once, haven't you? That's why you shouldn't have used Present Simple. You should have used future tense. Present Continuous is often used to describe future and in this case it's better than Future Simple which has got other uses.
Old Shatterhand napisał(a):Co do Past Simple, nie wiem, może i powinienem użyć.
In Polish, present tense is often used to describe past and future. In English, from among present tenses only Pr. Perfect can describe past and only Pr. Continuous can describe future.
Old Shatterhand napisał(a):But maybe I can't speak (write) English. I write here, because I try get better in use English.
Ach, I didn't fell offended (/Offned ?).
If you are trying to learn something, listen to our advices and don't behave like a little girl, stamping and screaming when someone tells her she made a mistake. And don't accuse me of finding a fault with you just because I don't like you. I'm trying to help you, you know?
Best regards.
Q.
At thy twilight, old thoughts return, in great waves of nostalgia.
30.10.2007, 19:52
